The latest news from ANH International

ANH PRESS RELEASE: EU Food supplement ban still a ticking time bomb (1)

Supplements: the answer for millions at risk of blindness, say US scientists (1) 669be15ecd83c.jpeg
The landmark legal challenge against the EU Food Supplements Directive is still alive - and there is everything to play for. Read on...

In this article

PRESS RELEASE
– For immediate release –

EU FOOD SUPPLEMENT BAN STILL A TICKING TIME BOMB
Alliance for Natural Health keeps the ball rolling in landmark lawsuit

The Alliance for Natural Health, the not-for-profit campaign organisation that pioneered a landmark legal action against a proposed EU ban on thousands of food supplements, has informed the UK government and High Court in London of its intention to continue its legal action.

Widespread publicity following the European Court of Justice (ECJ) judgment, handed down on 12th July 2005, implied that all had been lost since the Food Supplements Directive, the target of the challenge, had been upheld.

The ECJ ruling came as a surprise to many given an opinion issued in April 2005 by a senior advisor to the Court, Advocate General Leendert Geelhoed. Geelhoed had referred to the Food Supplements Directive “as transparent as a black box” and proposed that it contravened basic principles of European Community law and so was invalid under EU law.

The ANH has argued from the outset that the Court, in its judgment, has actually delivered a solution that takes into account the main concerns raised in its legal challenge, yet allows the Directive to be upheld. This approach has two major benefits over invalidating the Directive: it avoids the need to re-negotiate a new Directive, whilst it also allows the European institutions to save face. 

Recently appointed Legal Director for the ANH, barrister Robert Collins, says, “The ANH’s legal challenge is not yet complete. We need still to go back to the High Court in London where the challenge was initiated. The ANH intends to show how the Statutory Instrument that transposes the EU Directive into English and Welsh law is seriously out of step with the

European Court

‘s judgment.”

Collins continues, “Recently we have had some very constructive discussions with the UK‘s Food Standards Agency and we are hopeful that we can work collaboratively with the government towards a solution.”

Collins apparently demonstrated to the Food Standards Agency some of the key contradictions between the Statutory Instrument (the Food Supplements Regulations 2003) and the Court’s judgment. He showed, for example, that the judgment clearly demonstrates that the Directive does not apply to food supplements whose ingredients include plant extracts and other nutrients for which their use remains under national rules.

Says Collins, “We are hopeful that the British government, the party with which we initiated the challenge, will work constructively with us towards a solution. Our lead barrister, Paul Lasok QC at Monckton Chambers, argues that there is now a statutory requirement to change the national laws to bring them into line with the

European Court

judgment. The UK government is in a strong position to take a lead on this, and this will force similar changes in other EU member states. Without these changes, the Directive will not serve its intended purposes of harmonising laws across the EU and protecting consumers. Many people in different countries are fed up with over-zealous EU laws, and this is a landmark case which might help people to regain respect and faith in European law.”

Dr Robert Verkerk, Executive & Scientific Director of the ANH adds, “The European Food Supplements Directive, as it was originally proposed, would have acted as a massive barrier to innovative, food-form supplements. The ECJ ruling, once adopted into Member State laws, opens the door to natural, food-form nutrients. Instead of running frightened from this Directive, we need to see its potential as a means to a permissive regime with key similarities to the regime offered by the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act 1994 in the United States.”

Ends

For further information, please contact:

Dr Robert Verkerk, Executive & Scientific Director, Alliance for Natural Health
Tel:        +44 (0)1252 371 275
Email:    [email protected]
Web:     www.alliance-natural-health.org

Meleni Aldridge, Development Manager, Alliance for Natural Health

Tel:        +44 (0)1252 371 275
Mobile:  +44 (0)7771 750230
Email:    [email protected]
Web::    www.alliance-natural-health.org  

Note: Both contacts are presently in the USA and are available for interview.

Editor’s Notes:

ALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH

  1. The Alliance for Natural Health (ANH) is a Europe-wide and international non-profit alliance of consumers, doctors, complementary health practitioners, and innovative industry manufacturers and suppliers with interests in food supplements and natural health. More information, including details of the ANH’s support base, will be found at www.alliance-natural-health.org

  2. Good science and good law underpin all of the ANH’s work, and the scientific reports produced by the ANH are endorsed by many of the world’s leading doctors and scientists working in the field of nutrition.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Share:

Related Posts

ANH News Beat (week 03/2026) 696ea5b80df4e.png

ANH News Beat (week 03/2026)

Our weekly roundup of the latest natural news from across the globe in one place. This week: Are digital spaces harmful to young people?; Food preservatives & T2D; Gut health & brain health; Changes to US & UK childhood vax schedules; Being creative keeps our brains young; Updates from ANH-USA; Threats to Free Speech; Post-covid related and much more…

Tags - Associated Content

Shopping Basket